Constraints and parameters for the system design » History » Version 10

AUGER, Anne sophie, 03/23/2015 04:15 PM

1 1 GAY, Adrien
h1. Constraints and parameters for the system design
2 1 GAY, Adrien
3 7 GAY, Adrien
4 7 GAY, Adrien
h2. Constraints for the choice of the antennas:
5 7 GAY, Adrien
  
6 8 GAY, Adrien
The type of antenna and associated performances are strongly linked to the considered central frequency. However, constraints are not the same for the aircraft antenna or for the ISAE antenna as we will describe below. 
7 7 GAY, Adrien
8 7 GAY, Adrien
h3. ISAE antenna:
9 7 GAY, Adrien
10 7 GAY, Adrien
Given the distance and the bit rate required to fulfil the specifications, a tracking antenna might be needed on the roof on the antenna. Nevertheless, as this solution is considerably increasing the system complexity, we will try to design a system with a fixed mounted antenna if possible.
11 7 GAY, Adrien
12 7 GAY, Adrien
In fact, the need (or not) for tracking will be determined by the required figure of merit (G/T) of the antenna (computed in part III).  
13 7 GAY, Adrien
14 7 GAY, Adrien
*As increasing the gain of the antenna decreases its coverage (theta 3 dB), if the required gain of the antenna leads to a coverage smaller than the aircraft action zone, a tracking antenna will be required. 
15 7 GAY, Adrien
16 7 GAY, Adrien
17 7 GAY, Adrien
Aircraft action zone limited
18 7 GAY, Adrien
Increase gain ->> increase G/T but decrease coverage. If no tradeoff can be found between the coverage and the gain, a tracking antenna has to be used
19 7 GAY, Adrien
20 7 GAY, Adrien
Rq: high gain easier to realize for high frequencies, T decreasing when G increasing*
21 7 GAY, Adrien
22 7 GAY, Adrien
23 7 GAY, Adrien
h3. Aircraft antenna:
24 7 GAY, Adrien
25 7 GAY, Adrien
The connection between the aircraft and the ISAE building shall remain available for an inclination of 45° and an attitude of 15° at a distance of at least 50 km. 
26 7 GAY, Adrien
27 7 GAY, Adrien
As tracking antennas are not an option for the aircraft because of the complexity of integration, these availability requirements dictate a given radiation pattern for the aircraft antenna. 
28 7 GAY, Adrien
29 7 GAY, Adrien
*Graph pattern, idée antenne, mais masquage de l’avion …*
30 7 GAY, Adrien
31 7 GAY, Adrien
32 4 GAY, Adrien
h2. Constraints for the physical layer and RF equipment:
33 4 GAY, Adrien
34 4 GAY, Adrien
35 4 GAY, Adrien
(calcul Rb)
36 4 GAY, Adrien
37 4 GAY, Adrien
38 4 GAY, Adrien
From the given allocated frequency band, the following parameters are defined:
39 6 GAY, Adrien
* f : Central frequency of the emitted signal
40 6 GAY, Adrien
* B: Larger of the allocated bandwidth
41 6 GAY, Adrien
* EIRP: Maximum power that can be emitted in a given direction 
42 4 GAY, Adrien
43 4 GAY, Adrien
From the specifications, the following parameters are defined:
44 6 GAY, Adrien
* Rb: Useful bit rate of the transmission
45 6 GAY, Adrien
* R : Minimal distance for the transmission
46 4 GAY, Adrien
47 4 GAY, Adrien
The value of these parameters constrain the parameters of the physical layer and the RF equipment for the design of the system.
48 4 GAY, Adrien
49 4 GAY, Adrien
50 4 GAY, Adrien
h3. Physical layer:
51 4 GAY, Adrien
52 4 GAY, Adrien
The study of the physical layer will be limited to the choice of the modulation, the coding and the shaping filter. We will consider a SRRC filter (Square Root Raised Cosine) for the shaping filter as it is commonly used in telecommunication systems for its good performances. 
53 4 GAY, Adrien
54 4 GAY, Adrien
Then, the parameters of the physical layer are:
55 6 GAY, Adrien
* M : Modulation (M=4 : QPSK, M=8 : 8PSK etc)
56 6 GAY, Adrien
* rho : Coding rate (rho <1)
57 6 GAY, Adrien
* alpha : roll-off of the SRRC filter
58 4 GAY, Adrien
59 4 GAY, Adrien
In fact all these parameters are linked through the spectral efficiency T of the system, which is fixed by B and Rb:
60 4 GAY, Adrien
61 4 GAY, Adrien
T= cst  et  T=
62 4 GAY, Adrien
63 4 GAY, Adrien
Then, the parameters of the physical have to comply with the following relation:
64 4 GAY, Adrien
65 4 GAY, Adrien
T>cst
66 4 GAY, Adrien
67 4 GAY, Adrien
68 4 GAY, Adrien
69 4 GAY, Adrien
h3. Link budget:
70 4 GAY, Adrien
71 4 GAY, Adrien
Here is the expression of the link budget:
72 4 GAY, Adrien
73 4 GAY, Adrien
(link budget)
74 4 GAY, Adrien
75 4 GAY, Adrien
We can notice that all the parameters are already known, except:
76 5 GAY, Adrien
* (G/T): Figure of merit of the receiver (ISAE antenna)
77 5 GAY, Adrien
* Lmarg: Margin on the link budget to take into account all the perturbations (antenna   
78 4 GAY, Adrien
depointing, atmosphere attenuation, interferences, non-ideal demodulator …)
79 4 GAY, Adrien
80 4 GAY, Adrien
Lmarg being only linked to physical parameters, we don’t have any influence on it. Then, it has to be evaluated but it is not really a parameter of the design.
81 4 GAY, Adrien
82 4 GAY, Adrien
Power amplifier
83 4 GAY, Adrien
84 4 GAY, Adrien
85 4 GAY, Adrien
h2. Conclusion:
86 4 GAY, Adrien
87 4 GAY, Adrien
From these considerations, our aim will be to:
88 5 GAY, Adrien
* Choose the modulation and the coding (according to the shaping filter)
89 5 GAY, Adrien
* Compute the gain of the receiving antenna
90 5 GAY, Adrien
* Propose some technical solution for the receiving antenna
91 4 GAY, Adrien
92 4 GAY, Adrien
We will also develop tools to visualize the influence of the bandwidth, EIRP, useful bit rate and distance on the system design.
93 4 GAY, Adrien
94 4 GAY, Adrien
The aircraft antenna will be considered able to fulfil the required antenna pattern, but we will not discuss about technical solutions for this antenna, as it can be really tricky.