Constraints for the physical layer and RF equipment » History » Version 4
GAY, Adrien, 03/24/2015 12:35 AM
1 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | h1. Constraints for the physical layer and RF equipment |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
3 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | h2. Constraints for the physical layer and RF equipment: |
4 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
5 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
6 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | * Required bit rate |
7 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
8 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
9 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | In order to define the bit rate required for the transmission of video streams we need some input parameters, provided in the mission statement: |
10 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
11 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | > # aspect ratio of the video : AR=1,78 |
12 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | > # quality of the encoded video L=720p |
13 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | > # frame cadence FPS=12 fps |
14 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
15 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | We used the following formula |
16 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
17 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | p=. Bit rate = FPS*5,0692 * L ^1,391^ /(1000*AR) |
18 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
19 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | So |
20 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
21 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | p=. *Bit rate=322 Kbps* |
22 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
23 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | As the link will allow video transmission, we will need an adapted encapsulation protocol, so we must take into account extra bits: we decide to define a bit rate of 500 kbps. |
24 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
25 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
26 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
27 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | From the given allocated frequency band, the following parameters are defined: |
28 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | * f : Central frequency of the emitted signal |
29 | 2 | AUGER, Anne sophie | * B: Width of the allocated bandwidth |
30 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | * EIRP: Maximum power that can be emitted in a given direction |
31 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
32 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | From the specifications, the following parameters are defined: |
33 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | * Rb: Useful bit rate of the transmission |
34 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | * R : Minimal distance for the transmission |
35 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
36 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | The value of these parameters constrain the parameters of the physical layer and the RF equipment for the design of the system. |
37 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
38 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
39 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | h3. Physical layer: |
40 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
41 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | The study of the physical layer will be limited to the choice of the modulation, the coding and the shaping filter. We will consider a SRRC filter (Square Root Raised Cosine) for the shaping filter as it is commonly used in telecommunication systems for its good performances. |
42 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
43 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | Then, the parameters of the physical layer are: |
44 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | * M : Modulation (M=4 : QPSK, M=8 : 8PSK etc) |
45 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | * rho : Coding rate (rho <1) |
46 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | * alpha : roll-off of the SRRC filter |
47 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
48 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | In fact all these parameters are linked through the spectral efficiency T of the system, which is fixed by B and Rb: |
49 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
50 | 3 | GAY, Adrien | p=. $\tau = \frac{R_{b}}{B}$ and $\tau =\frac{\log_{2}(M)\rho}{1+\alpha}$ |
51 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
52 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | Then, the parameters of the physical have to comply with the following relation: |
53 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
54 | 4 | GAY, Adrien | p=. $\frac{\log_{2}(M)\rho}{1+\alpha}>\frac{R_{b}}{B}$ |
55 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
56 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
57 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
58 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | h3. Link budget: |
59 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
60 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | Here is the expression of the link budget: |
61 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
62 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | (link budget) |
63 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
64 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | We can notice that all the parameters are already known, except: |
65 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | * (G/T): Figure of merit of the receiver (ISAE antenna) |
66 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | * Lmarg: Margin on the link budget to take into account all the perturbations (antenna |
67 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | depointing, atmosphere attenuation, interferences, non-ideal demodulator …) |
68 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
69 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | Lmarg being only linked to physical parameters, we don’t have any influence on it. Then, it has to be evaluated but it is not really a parameter of the design. |
70 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
71 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | Power amplifier |
72 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
73 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
74 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | h2. Conclusion: |
75 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
76 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | From these considerations, our aim will be to: |
77 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | * Choose the modulation and the coding (according to the shaping filter) |
78 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | * Compute the gain of the receiving antenna |
79 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | * Propose some technical solution for the receiving antenna |
80 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
81 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | We will also develop tools to visualize the influence of the bandwidth, EIRP, useful bit rate and distance on the system design. |
82 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | |
83 | 1 | AUGER, Anne sophie | The aircraft antenna will be considered able to fulfil the required antenna pattern, but we will not discuss about technical solutions for this antenna, as it can be really tricky. |