Methodology for the design » History » Version 18

GAY, Adrien, 03/24/2015 12:30 AM

1 1 GAY, Adrien
h1. Methodology for the design
2 1 GAY, Adrien
3 1 GAY, Adrien
In order to fulfil the requirements, we have developed a methodology in three steps:
4 2 GAY, Adrien
* Evaluation of the required Modulation and Coding (MOCOD)
5 3 GAY, Adrien
* Estimation of the required Eb/N0 for this MODCOD
6 3 GAY, Adrien
* Computation of the (G/T) of the ISAE receiver required to cope with this Eb/N0 
7 1 GAY, Adrien
8 6 GAY, Adrien
Then, from the (G/T) value, we can discuss about the type of antenna that can be used for the ISAE receiver according to the constraints developed in _"constraints for antennas selection"_.
9 1 GAY, Adrien
10 1 GAY, Adrien
11 4 GAY, Adrien
12 3 GAY, Adrien
h2. Modulation and Coding:
13 1 GAY, Adrien
14 6 GAY, Adrien
As developed in _"Constraints for the physical layer"_ , we have the following relation between the modulation, the coding and the roll-off:
15 1 GAY, Adrien
16 18 GAY, Adrien
p=.  $\frac{R_{b}}{B} =\frac{\log_{2}(M)\rho}{1+\alpha}$
17 1 GAY, Adrien
18 13 GAY, Adrien
For the sake of simplicity, we will fix the roll off to $\alpha=0.2$, which is a typical value enabling a good tradeoff between the spectral efficiency and the threshold detector performances (used in DVB-S2 for example).
19 1 GAY, Adrien
20 13 GAY, Adrien
Then, considering that _M_ is a power of 2 and $\rho<1$, we can estimate from the previous relation the minimal MODCOD required:
21 7 GAY, Adrien
22 17 GAY, Adrien
p=. $M = 2^{nextpow2(2^{\frac{(1+\alpha)*R_{b}}{B}})}$
23 1 GAY, Adrien
24 17 GAY, Adrien
p=. $\rho = \frac{(1+\alpha)\cdot R_{b}}{B\cdot log_{2}(M)}$
25 1 GAY, Adrien
26 15 GAY, Adrien
27 14 GAY, Adrien
+Conclusion:+ *After fixing the value of the roll-off (here $\alpha=0.2$), the MODCOD is directly conditioned by the values of _B_ and _Rb_.*
28 1 GAY, Adrien
29 13 GAY, Adrien
30 13 GAY, Adrien
31 1 GAY, Adrien
h2. Required Eb/N0:
32 4 GAY, Adrien
33 8 GAY, Adrien
We choose a coding technique based on LDPC codes as introduced in DVB-S2 standard. This is a powerful coding scheme allowing higher spectral efficiencies for a given Eb/N0 compare to basic modulations.
34 1 GAY, Adrien
35 1 GAY, Adrien
Here is a table extracted from DVB-S2 standard (ETSI EN 302 307 V1.2.1, table 13), corresponding to quasi-error free performances:
36 9 GAY, Adrien
37 1 GAY, Adrien
38 1 GAY, Adrien
p=. !MODCOD_table.PNG!
39 1 GAY, Adrien
40 1 GAY, Adrien
41 1 GAY, Adrien
Given the MODCOD previously determined, we can read in this table the required value of Es/N0. Then, Eb/N0 can be computed thanks to the relation:
42 1 GAY, Adrien
43 13 GAY, Adrien
p=. $(\frac{E_{b}}{N0})_{dB}=(\frac{E_{S}}{N0})_{dB}-10*log_{10}(\frac{\eta}{1+\alpha})$
44 1 GAY, Adrien
45 13 GAY, Adrien
With _$\eta$_ the value of the spectral efficiency corresponding to the given MODCOD (second row of the table above). In fact, this value of spectral efficiency does not take into account the roll-off of the shaping filter, so we correct it in order to get the real spectral efficiency of the system.
46 1 GAY, Adrien
47 1 GAY, Adrien
48 12 GAY, Adrien
+Remarks:+
49 12 GAY, Adrien
50 12 GAY, Adrien
* The table specifies the ideal Es/N0. Margin for non-ideal demodulator will be taken into account in the computation of the link budget.
51 1 GAY, Adrien
* We can notice that lower MODCODs sometimes require higher Eb/N0 (at transition between modulations). In fact, lower modulation are preferred if possible even if it requires higher Eb/N0. In fact, there are more robust to perturbations such as multipath or phase noise for instance. This has to be kept in mind in order to explain some curves plotted in the result part.
52 1 GAY, Adrien
53 1 GAY, Adrien
54 1 GAY, Adrien
55 4 GAY, Adrien
h2. Computation of (G/T):
56 1 GAY, Adrien
57 16 GAY, Adrien
From the expression of the link budget, we get:
58 1 GAY, Adrien
59 16 GAY, Adrien
p=. $(\frac{G}{T})_{dB}=(\frac{E_{b}}{N0})_{dB}-10\cdot log_{10}(EIRP\cdot (\frac{\lambda}{4\cdot \pi\cdot R})^{2}\cdot\frac{1}{k\cdot R_{b}\cdot L_{marg}})$
60 1 GAY, Adrien
61 12 GAY, Adrien
With _Lmarg_ the only unknown which has to be evaluated in order to compute (G/T).
62 1 GAY, Adrien
63 1 GAY, Adrien
An accurate evaluation of the margin can be tricky and is not the aim of this project. Then we just roughly evaluated it:
64 12 GAY, Adrien
* Depointing of the antennas: Ldep= 3dB + 3dB=6 dB
65 12 GAY, Adrien
* Non-ideal demodulator: Ldem= 3 dB
66 12 GAY, Adrien
* Atmosphere attenuation (clear sky conditions): Lprop= 1.5 dB
67 12 GAY, Adrien
* Interferences: Lint= 1.5 dB
68 1 GAY, Adrien
69 16 GAY, Adrien
Then, we took _Lmarg= 12 dB_. However, the value of the margin can easily be modified for the simulations presented in _"Simulations and results"_  if needed.