Modulation and coding selection » History » Version 1
GAY, Adrien, 03/24/2015 11:12 AM
1 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | h1. Modulation and coding selection |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
3 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
4 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | h2. Modulation and Coding: |
5 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
6 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | As developed in _"Constraints for the physical layer"_ , we have the following relation between the modulation, the coding and the roll-off: |
7 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
8 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | p=. $\frac{\log_{2}(M)\rho}{1+\alpha}>\frac{R_{b}}{B}$ |
9 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
10 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | For the sake of simplicity, we will fix the roll off to $\alpha=0.2$, which is a typical value enabling a good tradeoff between the spectral efficiency and the threshold detector performances (used in DVB-S2 for example). |
11 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
12 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | Then, considering that _M_ is a power of 2 and $\rho<1$, we can estimate from the previous relation the minimal MODCOD required: |
13 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
14 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | p=. $M = 2^{nextpow2(2^{\frac{(1+\alpha)*R_{b}}{B}})}$ |
15 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
16 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | p=. $\rho = \frac{(1+\alpha)\cdot R_{b}}{B\cdot log_{2}(M)}$ |
17 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
18 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
19 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | +Conclusion:+ *After fixing the value of the roll-off (here $\alpha=0.2$), the MODCOD is directly conditioned by the values of _B_ and _Rb_.* |