Simulations and results » History » Version 3
GAY, Adrien, 03/23/2015 10:37 AM
1 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | h1. Simulations and results |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
3 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
4 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | From the method described previously, we have developed three Matlab programs enabling to compute or visualize the influence of various parameters according to what is assume known or not. |
5 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
6 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | h2. Computation of the MODCOD and (G/T) required: |
7 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
8 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | Supposing that the specifications and frequency band are known (Rb, R, f, B and EIRP are known), we directly get all the parameters for the system design by following the method described previously. |
9 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
10 | 3 | GAY, Adrien | +f= 869,5 MHz B= 250 kHz PAR= 0.5 W Rb=500 bits/s R=50 km:+ |
11 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
12 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | Figure |
13 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
14 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
15 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | Comment value (G/T) |
16 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
17 | 3 | GAY, Adrien | +f= 5 GHz B= 500 kHz EIRP= 1 W Rb=500 bits/s R=50 km:+ |
18 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
19 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
20 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | Figure |
21 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
22 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | Comment value (G/T) |
23 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
24 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
25 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
26 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | h2. Influence of the bandwidth on the EIRP: |
27 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
28 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | If the regulatory frequency for application is known, this tool enables to visualize the tradeoff between the EIRP and bandwidth to fulfil the specifications: |
29 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
30 | 3 | GAY, Adrien | +f= 869,5 MHz Rb=500 bits/s R=50 km:+ |
31 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
32 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | Figure |
33 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
34 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
35 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | Comments |
36 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
37 | 3 | GAY, Adrien | +f= 5 GHz Rb=500 bits/s R=50 km:+ |
38 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
39 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
40 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | Figure |
41 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
42 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | Comments |
43 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
44 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
45 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
46 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | h2. Influence of the distance on the bite rate: |
47 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
48 | 2 | GAY, Adrien | If the required system design is too constraining for a given specification, and then not achievable, we might lower our expectations and have a tradeoff between the desired bit rate and the range |
49 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
50 | 3 | GAY, Adrien | +f= 869,5 MHz B= 250 kHz PAR= 0.5 W+ |
51 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
52 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
53 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | Figure |
54 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
55 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
56 | 3 | GAY, Adrien | +f= 5 GHz B= 500kHz EIRP= 1 W+ |
57 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
58 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
59 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | Figure |
60 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
61 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
62 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | We can notice the bite rate is dropping quickly with the range of transmission. Then, the video transmission can be lost if the aircraft moves just a little bit too far of the limit range. |