B Satellite link » History » Version 6

piat, charles ugo, 03/21/2015 11:45 AM

1 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
h1. B Satellite link
2 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
3 6 piat, charles ugo
---
4 6 piat, charles ugo
5 6 piat, charles ugo
{{>toc}}
6 6 piat, charles ugo
7 5 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
h2. Pointing of the antenna
8 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
9 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
After some experiments, we have confirmed that the main factor of the SNR value is the correct pointing of the antenna as expected. Experimental uses have show that we may point the antenna to a little lower angle of elevation than expected (37-38 instead of 39-40 as asked by the satellite position estimation) This can be due to an error of the position calculation, some deviations on the structure of the antenna or improper antenna montage by the user. 
10 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
11 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
We advice to spend some time with the antenna pointing in order to get the higher SNR. The antenna sign of connection is not a consequence of the best link, is just a consequence of the possibility of setting up the link. That means that we don't have use to follow the signals from the Tria but add some time and effort to set a proper link.
12 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
13 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
From our experiments we got values between 5 and 10.3 dB of SNR after the connection with low shifts of the elevation and the azimuth.
14 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
15 5 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
h2. Clear sky conditions
16 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
17 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
Under clear sky we have obtained this characteristics:
18 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
19 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
IMAGE
20 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
21 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
And for transmission: 
22 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
23 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
IMAGE
24 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
25 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
Which granted a BW in that case of:
26 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
27 4 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
IMAGE
28 4 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
29 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
h2. Low rain conditions
30 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
31 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
In the other hand, under rain conditions we had the following results:
32 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
33 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
!lowrain.png!
34 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
35 4 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
We can compare it with some an almost clear sky conditions, with a 1.5dB improvement of the SNR
36 3 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
37 3 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
!clouds.png!
38 3 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
39 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
And for the transmission:
40 2 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
41 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
!transmissionclouds.png!
42 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
43 4 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
With the following available BW:
44 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
45 2 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
!cloudsBW.png!
46 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
47 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
h2. Conclusions
48 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
49 1 VEILLARD GAROZ, Loïc
We have to focus in the fact that the most important factor to have a good link is the pointing of the antenna. While the rain may attenuate the signal some dBs, we have seen that the satellite from our provider is probably running ACM, which definitively points out the pointing of the antenna as the main factor