FlexACM » History » Version 5
Version 4 (GAY, Adrien, 12/15/2014 06:18 PM) → Version 5/10 (GAY, Adrien, 12/15/2014 06:18 PM)
h1. FlexACM
FlexACM In-band signalling on the forward link:
!{width: 45%}InbandSigFW.png(FlexACM In-band signalling on the forward link.)!
FlexACM In-band signalling on the return link:
!{width: 45%}InbandSigRT.png(FlexACM In-band signalling on the return link.)!
As seen previously, the demodulator selects the optimal MODCOD based on the estimation of the signal Es/N0. However, the choice of the MODCOD is not only based on the comparison of the Es/N0 with the theoretical thresholds as distortion of the signal has to be taken into account (distortions from the channel or causes by a saturated transponder for examples). Moreover, we add some margin in the link budget by safety.
Then, the MODCOD is chosen by comparison of the estimated Es/N0 with the theoretical threshold of the MODCOD + the distortion + the margin, as shown on the figure below:
below
(figure p 124 newtec user manual).
We can notice on this figure that margin for selecting a higher MODCOD is higher that margin for selecting a lower MODCOD. This is advised by the constructor to create hysteresis and avoid togglings of MODCODS for specific values of Es/N0.
The distortion is estimated thanks to a NoDE (Noise and Distorsion estimator) feature implemented in the modem, margins can be set up by the user and the table below shows the different thresholds for the MODCODs:
Table thresholds MODCOD
Once the optimal MODCOD has been estimated at the demodulator, this information is sent back to the emitter side. Two options are possible: in-band or out-band signaling. This last one does not send the signaling messages back via the satellite but use another possible links (via a terrestrial network for example); it is not the one chosen for this project. We used in-band signaling, consisting in sending the MODCOD signaling messages directly via the return channel of the satellite link as non routable encapsulated IP packets.
FlexACM In-band signalling on the forward link:
!{width: 45%}InbandSigFW.png(FlexACM In-band signalling on the forward link.)!
FlexACM In-band signalling on the return link:
!{width: 45%}InbandSigRT.png(FlexACM In-band signalling on the return link.)!
As seen previously, the demodulator selects the optimal MODCOD based on the estimation of the signal Es/N0. However, the choice of the MODCOD is not only based on the comparison of the Es/N0 with the theoretical thresholds as distortion of the signal has to be taken into account (distortions from the channel or causes by a saturated transponder for examples). Moreover, we add some margin in the link budget by safety.
Then, the MODCOD is chosen by comparison of the estimated Es/N0 with the theoretical threshold of the MODCOD + the distortion + the margin, as shown on the figure below:
below
(figure p 124 newtec user manual).
We can notice on this figure that margin for selecting a higher MODCOD is higher that margin for selecting a lower MODCOD. This is advised by the constructor to create hysteresis and avoid togglings of MODCODS for specific values of Es/N0.
The distortion is estimated thanks to a NoDE (Noise and Distorsion estimator) feature implemented in the modem, margins can be set up by the user and the table below shows the different thresholds for the MODCODs:
Table thresholds MODCOD
Once the optimal MODCOD has been estimated at the demodulator, this information is sent back to the emitter side. Two options are possible: in-band or out-band signaling. This last one does not send the signaling messages back via the satellite but use another possible links (via a terrestrial network for example); it is not the one chosen for this project. We used in-band signaling, consisting in sending the MODCOD signaling messages directly via the return channel of the satellite link as non routable encapsulated IP packets.