Simulations and results » History » Version 11

GAY, Adrien, 03/23/2015 11:43 AM

1 1 GAY, Adrien
h1. Simulations and results
2 1 GAY, Adrien
3 1 GAY, Adrien
4 1 GAY, Adrien
From the method described previously, we have developed three Matlab programs enabling to compute or visualize the influence of various parameters according to what is assume known or not. 
5 1 GAY, Adrien
6 1 GAY, Adrien
h2. Computation of the MODCOD and (G/T) required:
7 1 GAY, Adrien
8 8 GAY, Adrien
Supposing that the specifications and frequency band are known (_Rb, R, f, B_ and _EIRP_ are known), we directly get all the parameters for the system design by following the method described previously.
9 1 GAY, Adrien
10 10 GAY, Adrien
_+f= 869,5 MHz    B= 250 kHz    PAR= 0.5 W    Rb=500 bits/s    R=50 km:+_
11 1 GAY, Adrien
12 9 GAY, Adrien
p=. !850M-MODCOD-GoT.png!
13 6 GAY, Adrien
14 1 GAY, Adrien
15 11 GAY, Adrien
*Comment value (G/T): low BW so "high" modcod, high power allows low GoT, does not need a directive antenna*
16 1 GAY, Adrien
17 10 GAY, Adrien
_+f= 5 GHz	  B= 500 kHz	EIRP= 1 W	Rb=500 bits/s	  R=50 km:+_
18 1 GAY, Adrien
19 1 GAY, Adrien
20 9 GAY, Adrien
p=. !5G-MODCOD-GoT.png!
21 1 GAY, Adrien
22 1 GAY, Adrien
23 1 GAY, Adrien
24 11 GAY, Adrien
*Comment value (G/T): higher BW so lower modcod, but high Got to compensate high free space loss (high freq) --> directive antenna*
25 1 GAY, Adrien
26 11 GAY, Adrien
27 11 GAY, Adrien
28 1 GAY, Adrien
h2. Influence of the bandwidth on the EIRP:
29 1 GAY, Adrien
30 1 GAY, Adrien
If the regulatory frequency for application is known, this tool enables to visualize the tradeoff between the EIRP and bandwidth to fulfil the specifications:
31 1 GAY, Adrien
32 10 GAY, Adrien
_+f= 869,5 MHz	  Rb=500 bits/s       R=50 km:+_
33 1 GAY, Adrien
34 9 GAY, Adrien
p=. !850M-BW_vs_EIRP.png!
35 1 GAY, Adrien
36 1 GAY, Adrien
37 1 GAY, Adrien
Comments
38 11 GAY, Adrien
39 11 GAY, Adrien
40 1 GAY, Adrien
41 10 GAY, Adrien
_+f= 5 GHz          Rb=500 bits/s       R=50 km:+_
42 1 GAY, Adrien
43 9 GAY, Adrien
p=. !5G-BW_vs_EIRP.png!
44 1 GAY, Adrien
45 1 GAY, Adrien
46 9 GAY, Adrien
47 1 GAY, Adrien
Comments
48 1 GAY, Adrien
49 1 GAY, Adrien
50 1 GAY, Adrien
51 1 GAY, Adrien
h2. Influence of the distance on the bite rate:
52 1 GAY, Adrien
53 1 GAY, Adrien
If the required system design is too constraining for a given specification, and then not achievable, we might lower our expectations and have a tradeoff between the desired bit rate and the range
54 1 GAY, Adrien
55 10 GAY, Adrien
_+f= 869,5 MHz	B= 250 kHz	PAR= 0.5 W+_
56 1 GAY, Adrien
57 9 GAY, Adrien
p=. !850M-range_vs_Bit_rate.png!
58 1 GAY, Adrien
59 1 GAY, Adrien
60 10 GAY, Adrien
_+f= 5 GHz	B= 500kHz	EIRP= 1 W+_
61 1 GAY, Adrien
62 1 GAY, Adrien
63 9 GAY, Adrien
p=. !5G-range_vs_Bit_rate.png!
64 1 GAY, Adrien
65 1 GAY, Adrien
66 1 GAY, Adrien
We can notice the bite rate is dropping quickly with the range of transmission. Then, the video transmission can be lost if the aircraft moves just a little bit too far of the limit range.