Simulations and results » History » Version 11
GAY, Adrien, 03/23/2015 11:43 AM
1 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | h1. Simulations and results |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
3 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
4 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | From the method described previously, we have developed three Matlab programs enabling to compute or visualize the influence of various parameters according to what is assume known or not. |
5 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
6 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | h2. Computation of the MODCOD and (G/T) required: |
7 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
8 | 8 | GAY, Adrien | Supposing that the specifications and frequency band are known (_Rb, R, f, B_ and _EIRP_ are known), we directly get all the parameters for the system design by following the method described previously. |
9 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
10 | 10 | GAY, Adrien | _+f= 869,5 MHz B= 250 kHz PAR= 0.5 W Rb=500 bits/s R=50 km:+_ |
11 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
12 | 9 | GAY, Adrien | p=. !850M-MODCOD-GoT.png! |
13 | 6 | GAY, Adrien | |
14 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
15 | 11 | GAY, Adrien | *Comment value (G/T): low BW so "high" modcod, high power allows low GoT, does not need a directive antenna* |
16 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
17 | 10 | GAY, Adrien | _+f= 5 GHz B= 500 kHz EIRP= 1 W Rb=500 bits/s R=50 km:+_ |
18 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
19 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
20 | 9 | GAY, Adrien | p=. !5G-MODCOD-GoT.png! |
21 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
22 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
23 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
24 | 11 | GAY, Adrien | *Comment value (G/T): higher BW so lower modcod, but high Got to compensate high free space loss (high freq) --> directive antenna* |
25 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
26 | 11 | GAY, Adrien | |
27 | 11 | GAY, Adrien | |
28 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | h2. Influence of the bandwidth on the EIRP: |
29 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
30 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | If the regulatory frequency for application is known, this tool enables to visualize the tradeoff between the EIRP and bandwidth to fulfil the specifications: |
31 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
32 | 10 | GAY, Adrien | _+f= 869,5 MHz Rb=500 bits/s R=50 km:+_ |
33 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
34 | 9 | GAY, Adrien | p=. !850M-BW_vs_EIRP.png! |
35 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
36 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
37 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | Comments |
38 | 11 | GAY, Adrien | |
39 | 11 | GAY, Adrien | |
40 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
41 | 10 | GAY, Adrien | _+f= 5 GHz Rb=500 bits/s R=50 km:+_ |
42 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
43 | 9 | GAY, Adrien | p=. !5G-BW_vs_EIRP.png! |
44 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
45 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
46 | 9 | GAY, Adrien | |
47 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | Comments |
48 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
49 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
50 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
51 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | h2. Influence of the distance on the bite rate: |
52 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
53 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | If the required system design is too constraining for a given specification, and then not achievable, we might lower our expectations and have a tradeoff between the desired bit rate and the range |
54 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
55 | 10 | GAY, Adrien | _+f= 869,5 MHz B= 250 kHz PAR= 0.5 W+_ |
56 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
57 | 9 | GAY, Adrien | p=. !850M-range_vs_Bit_rate.png! |
58 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
59 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
60 | 10 | GAY, Adrien | _+f= 5 GHz B= 500kHz EIRP= 1 W+_ |
61 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
62 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
63 | 9 | GAY, Adrien | p=. !5G-range_vs_Bit_rate.png! |
64 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
65 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | |
66 | 1 | GAY, Adrien | We can notice the bite rate is dropping quickly with the range of transmission. Then, the video transmission can be lost if the aircraft moves just a little bit too far of the limit range. |