Simulations and results » History » Version 13

GAY, Adrien, 03/24/2015 12:45 AM

1 1 GAY, Adrien
h1. Simulations and results
2 1 GAY, Adrien
3 1 GAY, Adrien
4 1 GAY, Adrien
From the method described previously, we have developed three Matlab programs enabling to compute or visualize the influence of various parameters according to what is assume known or not. 
5 1 GAY, Adrien
6 1 GAY, Adrien
h2. Computation of the MODCOD and (G/T) required:
7 1 GAY, Adrien
8 8 GAY, Adrien
Supposing that the specifications and frequency band are known (_Rb, R, f, B_ and _EIRP_ are known), we directly get all the parameters for the system design by following the method described previously.
9 1 GAY, Adrien
10 10 GAY, Adrien
_+f= 869,5 MHz    B= 250 kHz    PAR= 0.5 W    Rb=500 bits/s    R=50 km:+_
11 1 GAY, Adrien
12 9 GAY, Adrien
p=. !850M-MODCOD-GoT.png!
13 6 GAY, Adrien
14 1 GAY, Adrien
15 1 GAY, Adrien
16 10 GAY, Adrien
_+f= 5 GHz	  B= 500 kHz	EIRP= 1 W	Rb=500 bits/s	  R=50 km:+_
17 1 GAY, Adrien
18 1 GAY, Adrien
19 9 GAY, Adrien
p=. !5G-MODCOD-GoT.png!
20 1 GAY, Adrien
21 1 GAY, Adrien
22 1 GAY, Adrien
23 12 GAY, Adrien
We can see from these two simulations that:
24 12 GAY, Adrien
* The higher the Bandwidth, the lower the Modcod
25 12 GAY, Adrien
* The higher the frequency, the higher the free space loss, and then the higher the (G/T) and EIRP requested to compensate these losses.  
26 11 GAY, Adrien
27 12 GAY, Adrien
Moreover, we can evaluate the requested gain of the antennas from the (G/T) values. In fact, we have been told by Mr Perrin that the receivers temperature was between 400K and 600K, depending on the quality receiver and the directivity of the antenna (looking toward the ground or not?).
28 1 GAY, Adrien
29 12 GAY, Adrien
Then, a (G/T) of -27.3 dB corresponds more or less to an isotropic antenna, and a (G/T) of -16.9 dB corresponds to a 9 dB gain antenna, which is easily feasible at the 5 GHz frequency.
30 11 GAY, Adrien
31 1 GAY, Adrien
h2. Influence of the bandwidth on the EIRP:
32 1 GAY, Adrien
33 1 GAY, Adrien
If the regulatory frequency for application is known, this tool enables to visualize the tradeoff between the EIRP and bandwidth to fulfil the specifications:
34 1 GAY, Adrien
35 10 GAY, Adrien
_+f= 869,5 MHz	  Rb=500 bits/s       R=50 km:+_
36 1 GAY, Adrien
37 9 GAY, Adrien
p=. !850M-BW_vs_EIRP.png!
38 1 GAY, Adrien
39 1 GAY, Adrien
40 11 GAY, Adrien
41 10 GAY, Adrien
_+f= 5 GHz          Rb=500 bits/s       R=50 km:+_
42 1 GAY, Adrien
43 9 GAY, Adrien
p=. !5G-BW_vs_EIRP.png!
44 1 GAY, Adrien
45 1 GAY, Adrien
46 1 GAY, Adrien
47 13 GAY, Adrien
These types of curves are especially helpful when it comes to a request of frequency allocation when you have to provide the required EIRP and bandwidth requested for the system. 
48 13 GAY, Adrien
49 13 GAY, Adrien
The increase of the requested EIRP at the transitions between the modulation comes from the fact that lower lower MODCOD might request higher Eb/N0. This has already been discussed in the part _"Evaluatioon of the required Eb/N0"_.
50 1 GAY, Adrien
51 1 GAY, Adrien
52 1 GAY, Adrien
53 1 GAY, Adrien
h2. Influence of the distance on the bite rate:
54 1 GAY, Adrien
55 1 GAY, Adrien
If the required system design is too constraining for a given specification, and then not achievable, we might lower our expectations and have a tradeoff between the desired bit rate and the range
56 1 GAY, Adrien
57 10 GAY, Adrien
_+f= 869,5 MHz	B= 250 kHz	PAR= 0.5 W+_
58 1 GAY, Adrien
59 9 GAY, Adrien
p=. !850M-range_vs_Bit_rate.png!
60 1 GAY, Adrien
61 1 GAY, Adrien
62 10 GAY, Adrien
_+f= 5 GHz	B= 500kHz	EIRP= 1 W+_
63 1 GAY, Adrien
64 1 GAY, Adrien
65 9 GAY, Adrien
p=. !5G-range_vs_Bit_rate.png!
66 1 GAY, Adrien
67 1 GAY, Adrien
68 1 GAY, Adrien
We can notice the bite rate is dropping quickly with the range of transmission. Then, the video transmission can be lost if the aircraft moves just a little bit too far of the limit range.