Link Budget » History » Version 28
RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson , 03/23/2015 08:15 PM
1 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | h1. Satellite Link Budget |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
3 | 2 | SERRA FONT, Anna | In this section we are going to explain what is a satellite link budget and what are the main parameters it involves. |
4 | 2 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
5 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | h2. Satellite Communication System |
6 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
7 | 23 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | Assuming that a telecommunication system is composed by a transmitter a medium and a receiver, the link budget is the accounting of all gain and losses in the power signal from the transmitter, passing through the medium, to the receiver.So, the link budget analyses how much power is lost in the signal path. With link power analysis it's possible discriminate the value of power loss in each equipment and sub-path. |
8 | 13 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
9 | 23 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | p. To easily understand, we can analyse the satellite system showed in figure 1. Considering a signal one-way-travel, just analyzing the individual uplink path, the link budget will perform the power received by the satellite taking in account the amplification and the attenuation of the link.The link, in this case, is composed by the transmitter: the _Earth Station_, the media: _the atmosphere and free space_ ,and the receiver: _the Satellite_. Then, in the link budget calculating, we taking in account the following losses and gains: |
10 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
11 | 18 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
12 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Gain of the transmitter and receiver amplifier. |
13 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Attenuation in the atmosphere propagation. |
14 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Depointing losses. |
15 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Polarization mismatch losses. |
16 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Losses in transmitting and receiving equipment. |
17 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
18 | 12 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
19 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | p=. !{width: 50%}figure2.png! |
20 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
21 | 24 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | <div style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; width: 50em">Figure 1 - Gain and losses from a signal travelling from a transmitter to a receiver, considering individual uplink path. *P* is the power before the transmitter amplifier, *Gain* is the transmitter amplifier gain, *PR* is the power received, *Loss 1* the power lost due to the transmitter equipment, *Loss 2* the power lost due to the atmosphere effects, *Loss 3* the power lost due to the receiver equipment. |
22 | 18 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | </div> |
23 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
24 | 24 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | p. To evaluate the quality of our link, one important measure is the Bit Error Rate, $BER$. If we want that our signal maintain a low $BER$ we must to start the transmission with a higher power. We have to be sure that even with all losses along the path way, we'll have enough power available at each point, to keep this $BER$ value.The $BER$ is a function of the bit energy per noise-density of the signal $\frac{Eb}{No}$. The ratio between $BER$ and $\frac{Eb}{No}$ depends on the digital modulating implemented. An example of $BER$ x $\frac{Eb}{No}$ graphic is showed in figure 2. Higher $\frac{Eb}{No}$ means better quality. |
25 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
26 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | p=. !{width: 40%}figure3.png! |
27 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
28 | 24 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | <div style="text-align: center;">Figure 2 - Exemples of $BER$ x $\frac{Eb}{No}$ graphics. M-PSK constellations, no coding situation.</div> |
29 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
30 | 23 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | Other important parameters to consider in link budget analysis performance are: |
31 | 18 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Link performance: _Carrier-to-noise power ratio_ $$ \frac{C}{No} $$ |
32 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
33 | 24 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | It's a measure of the power received by receiving equipment, "C", and the noise power density $No$, introduced in the transmission medium. It is also a measure of the quality of modulated carrier in the receiver input. |
34 | 18 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
35 | 18 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Transmit equipment performance towards receiver: _Effective isotropic radiated power_ $$EIRP$$ |
36 | 17 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | Is a measure of the power $P_T$ and the performance of the transmit equipment in the direction of the receiver. It is expressed in dBW. |
37 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
38 | 23 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Receiving equipment performance: _Figure of merit_ $$G/T$$ |
39 | 18 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
40 | 18 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | The figure of merit is expressed by a ratio between the maximum gain of a receiving antenna to the system equivalent noise temperature.In general it is expressed in dB/K. This relation is also a measure of the ability of the receiver to receive a signal with good quality (high carrier-to-noise ratio). |
41 | 18 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
42 | 28 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | Figure 3 shows the detailed elements and parameters involved in a satellite link. The transmitter $Tx$ is connected to the antenna by a feeder. The antenna has a gain $G_T$ in the receiver direction. The power radiated by the emitter after the feeder loss $F_{FTX}$ is $P_T$. The receiver antenna has a gain $G_R$ in the direction of the transmit equipment, connected by a feeder in a receiver equipment $Rx$. In the receiver input the power received is denoted by $C$. in the link, all sources of noise contributes to the system noise temperature $T$. The ${(C/No)}_T$ depends on the system noise temperature (which condition the noyse power spectral density $No$). |
43 | 27 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
44 | 12 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | p=. !{width: 60%}figure4.png! |
45 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
46 | 24 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | <div style="text-align: center;">Figure 3 - Link configuration.</div> |
47 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
48 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna |