PART3 » History » Version 58

JANVIER, Thibault, 03/23/2016 10:17 AM

1 46 JANVIER, Thibault
h1. PART 5 : Implementation and results.
2 2 COLIN, Tony
3 20 COLIN, Tony
{{toc}}
4 2 COLIN, Tony
5 47 JANVIER, Thibault
This part is dedicated to explain and illustrate the main steps that have been done in order to retrieve a navigation signal and to compute the position of the receiver from the pseudo-range measurements of 4 satellites. [[PART|PART 2]], [[PART2|PART 3]] and [[PART41|PART 4]] provided a theoretical background on GPS signals, the main blocks of a GPS receiver and methods to compute the position using the navigation data. Now, it is time to put this theoretical knowledge into practice.
6 47 JANVIER, Thibault
As lots of VIs have been created, a UML diagram has been drawn to illustrate the structure of the overall code. For each main step that will be described, a link to the UML diagram will be provided, the different VIs to be taken into consideration will be listed, a few key points regarding the implementation will be clarified and the results will be displayed.
7 2 COLIN, Tony
8 2 COLIN, Tony
---
9 2 COLIN, Tony
10 4 COLIN, Tony
h2. 1 - Starting point.
11 2 COLIN, Tony
12 49 JANVIER, Thibault
h3. a - Quid about LabVIEW.
13 1 COLIN, Tony
14 49 JANVIER, Thibault
Labview is a modular dataflow programming language that relies on block diagrams interconnected with each other. Each block diagram represents a node, a function that can be run as soon as its inputs are available. Then, it computes outputs used as inputs by other nodes. Any created program can be reused as a node in a higher-level program, hence the modularity of Labview. While running a program, each input can be controlled thanks to a user interface known as a “front panel”. Likewise, every output can be monitored and displayed using the front panel. As a matter of fact, the front panel is closely linked to the program called the “block diagram”. Indeed, every primary input of the block diagram are defined and controlled via the front panel.
15 1 COLIN, Tony
16 49 JANVIER, Thibault
h3. b - Receiver scheme and milestones.
17 34 COLIN, Tony
18 49 JANVIER, Thibault
The software-defined GPS receiver to be implemented should take as an input a sampled signal that has been received and down-converted by an RF receiver front-end. As our RF receiver front-end was missing an antenna, we used a recorded GPS raw signal from the output of an RF front end (from CD *[1]* under GNSS_signal_records/GPSdata-DiscreteComponents-fs38_192-if9_55.bin). In order to read properly the data that are contained in the recorded file, one needs to know the sampling frequency and the intermediate frequency of the raw signal.
19 49 JANVIER, Thibault
Sampling frequency = 38.192 MHz
20 49 JANVIER, Thibault
Intermediate frequency = 9.55 MHz
21 50 JANVIER, Thibault
The following diagram sums up the general structure of the GPS receiver to be implemented.
22 1 COLIN, Tony
23 50 JANVIER, Thibault
p=. !SDR_GPS_Receiver.png!
24 50 JANVIER, Thibault
*Figure 5.1*: General receiver sheme.
25 34 COLIN, Tony
26 34 COLIN, Tony
h3. c - Local C/A code generation.
27 34 COLIN, Tony
28 43 COLIN, Tony
The files involved are :
29 55 COLIN, Tony
- _CA_Code.vi_ : attachment:"SnapCACode.png"
30 55 COLIN, Tony
- _CA_generatorG1.vi_ : attachment:"SnapG1.PNG"
31 56 COLIN, Tony
- _CA_generatorG2.vi_ : attachment:"SnapG2.png"
32 4 COLIN, Tony
33 51 JANVIER, Thibault
These VIs allow generating a PRN sequence according to the satellite ID and the sampling frequency. Indeed, the newly generated PRN sequence has to be multiplied with the incoming signal. Knowing that the period of one PRN sequence is 1 ms, the length of the generated sequence has to be adjusted according to the sampling frequency. With a sampling frequency of 1.023 MHz, a sampled PRN sequence with 1023 samples is generated. With a sampling frequency of 38.192 MHz, a sampled PRN sequence with 38192 samples is generated.
34 51 JANVIER, Thibault
35 52 JANVIER, Thibault
p=. !PRN_sequence.png!
36 52 JANVIER, Thibault
*Figure 5.2*: Example of a locally generated PRN sequence.
37 52 JANVIER, Thibault
38 53 JANVIER, Thibault
In Figure 5.2, a PRN sequence corresponding to satellite 21 has been generated with a sampling frequency of 38.192 MHz. This PRN sequence lasts 1 ms (a zoom has been done on the figure in order to see the sequence of chips).
39 52 JANVIER, Thibault
40 4 COLIN, Tony
---
41 4 COLIN, Tony
42 4 COLIN, Tony
h2. 2 - Acquisition.
43 1 COLIN, Tony
44 43 COLIN, Tony
*See the UML Diagram of Section 2 under :* attachment:"Acquisition.png"
45 43 COLIN, Tony
46 43 COLIN, Tony
The files involved are :
47 44 COLIN, Tony
- _Main_Acquisition.vi_ : attachment:"SnapAcquisition.PNG"
48 44 COLIN, Tony
- _Acquisition_subVI.vi_ : attachment:"SnapAcquisitionSub.png"
49 55 COLIN, Tony
- _CA_Code.vi_ : attachment:"SnapCACode.png"
50 43 COLIN, Tony
51 58 JANVIER, Thibault
In [[PART2|PART 3]], three different methods for acquisition have been described. Each of these methods exhibits different performances regarding the execution time and the accuracy of the frequency and code phase estimations. It has been explained that the parallel code phase search acquisition is less time consuming than the others. Likewise, it is more accurate regarding the estimation of the code phase, which will facilitate the convergence of the DLL towards its settling state. Thereby, the parallel code phase search acquisition will be implemented.
52 57 JANVIER, Thibault
The parallel code phase search acquisition requires to search among the frequencies around the intermediate frequency of the raw signal because of the Doppler that is induced by the motion of the satellite relatively to the receiver. This searching process is finite, meaning that the range of ± 10 kHz around the intermediate frequency has to be swept with a frequency step. Such a frequency step induces a frequency mismatch between the actual frequency of the raw signal and the local frequency of the receiver. This frequency mismatch translates into losses during the acquisition process. A common GPS receiver exhibits 1 dB of loss during the acquisition process. Such a loss is reached provided that:
53 57 JANVIER, Thibault
54 57 JANVIER, Thibault
p=. !Loss_acquisition.png!
55 57 JANVIER, Thibault
56 57 JANVIER, Thibault
Where ∆f is the maximum frequency mismatch and T_coh is coherent time of integration.
57 57 JANVIER, Thibault
Given that we integrate over 1 ms, which corresponds to the period of one PRN sequence, the maximum frequency mismatch should be less than 500 Hz. By using a frequency step of 500 Hz, the searching process has to go through 41 different frequencies to cover the range of ± 10 kHz around the intermediate frequency and the maximum frequency mismatch is 250 Hz. Thus, the acquisition process exhibits less than 1 dB of losses.
58 54 JANVIER, Thibault
59 37 JANVIER, Thibault
Justification acquisition method in terms of accuracy and time execution
60 37 JANVIER, Thibault
Justification of the step of 500Hz
61 37 JANVIER, Thibault
Methods to avoid the data bit transition while running acquisition
62 37 JANVIER, Thibault
Frequency refine is needed for the PLL of the tracking to converge
63 37 JANVIER, Thibault
Definition of the threshold and how it is implemented
64 37 JANVIER, Thibault
65 37 JANVIER, Thibault
66 4 COLIN, Tony
h3. .......
67 4 COLIN, Tony
68 4 COLIN, Tony
...........
69 4 COLIN, Tony
70 4 COLIN, Tony
---
71 4 COLIN, Tony
72 4 COLIN, Tony
h2. 3 - Tracking.
73 1 COLIN, Tony
74 45 JANVIER, Thibault
Justification of the DLL discriminator
75 45 JANVIER, Thibault
Correction of the blocksize to read as a function of the doppler shift
76 45 JANVIER, Thibault
77 43 COLIN, Tony
*See the UML Diagram of Section 2 under :* attachment:"Track.png"
78 43 COLIN, Tony
79 43 COLIN, Tony
The files involved are :
80 44 COLIN, Tony
- _Main_Carrier_Tracking.vi_ : attachment:"SnapTracking.png"
81 44 COLIN, Tony
- _CalcLoopCoeff.vi_ : attachment:"SnapCalcLoopCoeff.PNG"
82 43 COLIN, Tony
83 4 COLIN, Tony
h3. .......
84 4 COLIN, Tony
85 4 COLIN, Tony
...........
86 4 COLIN, Tony
87 35 COLIN, Tony
p=. !TrackingMin.PNG!
88 35 COLIN, Tony
89 4 COLIN, Tony
---
90 4 COLIN, Tony
91 4 COLIN, Tony
h2. 4 - Navigation Data decoding.
92 4 COLIN, Tony
93 13 COLIN, Tony
*See the UML Diagram of Section 4 under :* attachment:"NavigationData.PNG".
94 10 COLIN, Tony
95 29 COLIN, Tony
h3. a - Delimiting subframes.
96 1 COLIN, Tony
97 29 COLIN, Tony
The files involved are :
98 55 COLIN, Tony
- _FindPreamble.vi_ : attachment:"SnapFindPreamble.png"
99 44 COLIN, Tony
- _TestFindPreamble.vi_ : attachment:"SnapTestFindPreamble.PNG"
100 55 COLIN, Tony
- _GenerateFrame.vi_ : attachment:"SnapGenerateFrame.png"
101 44 COLIN, Tony
- _ParityCheck.vi_ : attachment:"SnapParityCheck.PNG"
102 1 COLIN, Tony
103 1 COLIN, Tony
p=. !Preamble1.PNG! !Preamble2.PNG!
104 23 COLIN, Tony
105 26 COLIN, Tony
p((((. *Figure 5. :* Cross-correlation between navigation frame and local preamble. *Figure 5. :* Subframes with index of delimitation.
106 29 COLIN, Tony
107 23 COLIN, Tony
h3. b- Decoding ephemeris and information within the frame.
108 29 COLIN, Tony
109 29 COLIN, Tony
The files involved are :
110 55 COLIN, Tony
- _Ephemeris.vi_ : attachment:"SnapEphemeris.png"
111 44 COLIN, Tony
- _BinaryArrayToDecimal.vi_ : attachment:"SnapBinaryArrayToDecimal.PNG"
112 44 COLIN, Tony
- _twosComp2dec.vi_ : attachment:"SnapTwosComp2dec.PNG"
113 44 COLIN, Tony
- _ParityCheck.vi__ : attachment:"SnapParityCheck.PNG"
114 4 COLIN, Tony
- _TestEphemeris.vi_
115 4 COLIN, Tony
116 1 COLIN, Tony
---
117 4 COLIN, Tony
118 43 COLIN, Tony
h2. 5 - Elementary blocks for localization.
119 10 COLIN, Tony
120 14 COLIN, Tony
*See the UML Diagram of Section 5 under :* attachment:"Localization.PNG"
121 4 COLIN, Tony
122 31 COLIN, Tony
h3. a - Satellite position.
123 1 COLIN, Tony
124 31 COLIN, Tony
The files involved are :
125 55 COLIN, Tony
- _SatellitePosition.vi_ : attachment:"SnapSatellitePosition.png"
126 44 COLIN, Tony
- _TestSatellitePosition.vi_ : attachment:"SnapTest_satellite_position.PNG"
127 44 COLIN, Tony
- _Check_time.vi_ : attachment:"SnapCheckTime.PNG"
128 23 COLIN, Tony
129 31 COLIN, Tony
p=. !SatPos.PNG!
130 8 COLIN, Tony
*Figure 5. :* Interface with ephemeris as input and illustration of the satellite position.
131 32 COLIN, Tony
132 1 COLIN, Tony
h3. b - Pseudoranges.
133 32 COLIN, Tony
134 32 COLIN, Tony
The file involved is :
135 8 COLIN, Tony
_PseudorangesComputation.vi_
136 33 COLIN, Tony
137 1 COLIN, Tony
h3. c - Least Square solution for position determination.
138 33 COLIN, Tony
139 33 COLIN, Tony
The files involved are :
140 55 COLIN, Tony
- _LeastSquarePosition.vi_ : attachment:"SnapLeastSquare.png"
141 44 COLIN, Tony
- _SatelliteRotationECEF.vi_ : attachment:"SnapSatelliteRotationECEF.PNG"
142 44 COLIN, Tony
- _toTopocentric.vi_ : attachment:"SnaptoTopocentric.PNG"
143 44 COLIN, Tony
- _CartesianToGeodetic.vi_ : attachment:"SnapCartesianToGeodetic.PNG"
144 55 COLIN, Tony
- _TroposphericCorrection.vi_ : attachment:"SnapTropospheric.PNG"
145 1 COLIN, Tony
146 43 COLIN, Tony
h2. 6 - Receiver position computation.
147 43 COLIN, Tony
148 43 COLIN, Tony
*See the UML Diagram of Section 6 under :* attachment:"Receiver.PNG"
149 43 COLIN, Tony
150 43 COLIN, Tony
The files involved are :
151 55 COLIN, Tony
- _ComputeReceiverPosition.vi_ : attachment:"SnapReceiver.png"
152 55 COLIN, Tony
- _NavigationProcess.vi_ : attachment:"SnapNavigationProcess.PNG"
153 44 COLIN, Tony
- _CartesianToGeodeticForUTM.vi_ : attachment:"SnapCartesianToGeodeticForUTM.PNG"
154 55 COLIN, Tony
- _CartesianToUTM.vi_ : attachment:"SnapCartesianToUTM.png"
155 43 COLIN, Tony
156 43 COLIN, Tony
h2. 7 - Complete UML Diagram of the receiver.
157 2 COLIN, Tony
158 41 COLIN, Tony
*The UML diagram with real size is available under :* attachment:"UMLDiagram.png"
159 6 COLIN, Tony
160 40 COLIN, Tony
Here is a small overview of the structure :
161 40 COLIN, Tony
162 40 COLIN, Tony
p=. !UMLDoverview.PNG!
163 40 COLIN, Tony
164 2 COLIN, Tony
---
165 3 COLIN, Tony
166 3 COLIN, Tony
*References :* 
167 3 COLIN, Tony
*[1]* K. Borre, D. M. Akos, N. Bertelsen, P. Rinder, S. H. Jensen, A software-defined GPS and GALILEO receiver